Government Response to Drug Shortages: Federal Actions in 2025-2026

Government Response to Drug Shortages: Federal Actions in 2025-2026

Jan, 12 2026 Tristan Chua

By the end of 2024, more than 300 drugs were in short supply across the United States. Cancer treatments, antibiotics, anesthetics, and even basic saline solutions became harder to find in hospitals. This wasn’t a one-time crisis-it’s the new normal. And the federal government is finally trying to fix it. But the solutions being pushed right now are uneven, underfunded, and missing the real problem.

What’s Actually Being Stockpiled-and Why It’s Not Enough

In August 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14178, expanding the Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve (SAPIR). This program doesn’t stockpile pills or injections. It stores the raw chemical building blocks-active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs)-needed to make 26 critical drugs. The idea is simple: APIs last longer, cost less to store, and are easier to ship than finished medicines. They’re also harder for foreign suppliers to hold hostage.

The FDA says China supplies about 80% of the APIs used in U.S. medications. That’s a huge risk. If a factory in Shanghai shuts down, or a shipping lane gets blocked, hospitals feel it months later. SAPIR aims to cut that dependency by keeping enough raw material on hand to produce these drugs domestically during emergencies.

But here’s the catch: only 26 drugs are covered. That’s less than 5% of all medications that have ever gone short. The FDA’s own database shows over 1,200 drugs have faced shortages since 2012. Oncology drugs alone made up 31% of all shortages in 2024, yet only 4% of SAPIR’s list focuses on them. A hospital treating a leukemia patient might find their chemo drug gone, but the federal reserve won’t help because it’s not on the list.

The FDA’s Role: Fixing Problems, Not Preventing Them

The FDA doesn’t just sit back and watch shortages happen. They work directly with manufacturers to fix them. In 85% of cases, they help by speeding up inspections, letting in temporary imports, or approving new production lines. That’s how they resolved the 2018-2020 saline shortage that hit 90% of U.S. hospitals.

But prevention? That’s where things fall apart. Federal law requires drugmakers to report potential shortages six months in advance. In theory, that gives the system time to react. In practice? Only 58% of companies report on time. Small manufacturers-those with fewer than 50 employees-are even worse, missing reporting deadlines 82% of the time.

The FDA’s new AI-powered monitoring system, launched in November 2025, tries to fill that gap. It tracks shipping data, hospital orders, and factory output across 17 sources to predict shortages 90 days ahead with 82% accuracy. That’s impressive. But if manufacturers aren’t telling the FDA what’s going wrong, even the smartest algorithm is flying blind.

And enforcement? Nearly nonexistent. Between 2020 and 2024, the FDA issued just 17 warning letters for failure to report shortages. In the European Union, under similar rules, they issued 142. No penalties. No consequences. Why would a company risk losing money by reporting a problem early?

A warehouse of raw pharmaceutical ingredients with only one labeled reserve crate glowing red.

Why Domestic Manufacturing Isn’t Coming Back

The government keeps talking about bringing drug production back to the U.S. But the numbers don’t lie. In 2024, the FDA approved 56 new manufacturing facilities for critical drugs. Of those, 42% were built in Ireland and Singapore-not America.

Why? Because it’s cheaper and faster overseas. Building a new API plant in the U.S. takes 28 to 36 months just to get FDA approval. In the EU, it’s 18 to 24 months. That’s a two-year delay just to get started.

Then there’s the money problem. Sterile injectables-like antibiotics and painkillers-make up 73% of all shortages. They’re cheap to make, and the profit margins are razor-thin. No company wants to invest millions in a factory that might only earn $0.50 per dose. The market doesn’t reward safety or redundancy. It rewards low cost.

The Department of Commerce announced $285 million in CHIPS Act funding for pharmaceutical plants in September 2025. Sounds big. But industry analysts say it covers less than 5% of the $6 billion needed to build enough domestic capacity to make a real difference.

What’s Working? The One Thing Everyone Agrees On

There’s one federal program that actually works: the FDA’s Early Notification Pilot Program. Hospitals and pharmacies that join this program report shortages faster and get better support. The result? Shortages last 28% less time.

Why? Because it gives them tools, training, and direct access to FDA experts. It turns hospitals from passive victims into active partners.

But here’s the irony: the current administration has weakened this program’s requirements. Mandatory reporting? Reduced. Funding? Cut. Support staff? Gone. Meanwhile, the European Union has a centralized system where every member state shares real-time data on drug availability. Between 2022 and 2024, that system cut shortages by 37%.

The U.S. could do the same. But it would require cooperation, funding, and political will-all things that are in short supply.

A split scene comparing slow U.S. drug manufacturing to efficient overseas facilities, with profit tipping the scale.

The Real Cost: Hospitals, Pharmacists, and Patients Pay the Price

When a drug disappears, hospitals scramble. They substitute cheaper or less effective alternatives. Sometimes, they compound drugs from raw chemicals-like pharmacists in Texas who had to mix cisplatin by hand during a cancer drug shortage.

The American Hospital Association says hospitals now spend an average of $1.2 million a year just managing shortages. That’s not profit loss. That’s pure overhead. Nurses and pharmacists spend 10+ hours a week tracking down drugs. One in five pharmacists report near-miss errors because they gave the wrong substitute.

Patients aren’t just inconvenienced. They’re at risk. A September 2025 survey by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network found 68% of oncology patients had their treatment changed because their drug wasn’t available. Nearly 30% of Americans skipped doses because they couldn’t get their medication-regardless of price.

This isn’t a supply chain issue. It’s a human crisis.

The Bigger Picture: Profit Over Preparedness

The federal response to drug shortages looks like a patchwork of fixes, not a plan. Stockpile APIs? Sure. But cut funding to the very programs that help hospitals prepare? Yes. Encourage domestic production? Maybe. But make it so slow and expensive that no one wants to try?

The root problem isn’t foreign factories or shipping delays. It’s that the U.S. pharmaceutical market doesn’t pay companies to make safe, reliable, low-margin medicines. The system rewards volume and profit-not resilience.

Until Congress and the FDA change that, no amount of stockpiling, AI, or executive orders will stop the next shortage. The next drug that vanishes from shelves might not be on SAPIR’s list. But it will still be the one someone’s life depends on.